Samples

@nk1rwc 🤔

@CSharpIsGud No, it has (not math) things.

what theforark said ot has other stuff

@TheForArkLD it has outputting to the screen, thats about it

@CSharpIsGud yes(this program), but it(lang) has other commands.
did you read document? you can read document from github.

@TheForArkLD yeah and the only thing the instructions do is

• math instructions like add sub mul div
• output things to the terminal
• store things in some data section to be outputted to the terminal since thats basically all that can be done with it

@TheForArkLD What it needs to be something you can use for a real project:

• A way to import C# functions to be able to interact with APIs like file io
• Standard libraries to interact with basic things like file io using the above

It's too late to add these things now but when the judging ends and you don't throw it away it needs them.

@CSharpIsGud huh, you didn't read document. read document again.

@TheForArkLD I am not talking about sections, it does not matter how many sections you make, there aren't any instructions for anything but stack, basic terminal output and math

@CSharpIsGud huh, talk to you is waste of time.
because you aren't reading document.

@TheForArkLD I READ THE DOCUMENT AND THAT IS WHAT IM POINTING OUT

@CSharpIsGud HUHHHH DID YOU SEE and, or, xor, AND not etc???

@TheForArkLD I count those as mathematical operators, they are bitwise operations. I am talking about instructions to import a C# function and call it, to make it possible to do things other than simply manipulating numbers

@CSharpIsGud hmm

@CSharpIsGud A agree that it would be nice to have an FFI.

However, would you call x86 useless since it can only manipulate numbers?

@fuzzyastrocat btw, repl.it is x64.

@TheForArkLD x64 is really x86-64, so I just consider all those under the umbrella of "x86"

@fuzzyastrocat yes? yea yes.

@fuzzyastrocat x86 can edit memory, interact with serial ports, etc. It defines the basics of what everything can do, if all you could do is write numbers to the screen it would be useless

@CSharpIsGud Ah, I didn't realize Obratnaya was incapable of syscalls. Yes, I agree with you then.

@fuzzyastrocat Since obratnaya compiles to .NET bytecode even if he adds some way to import C# code it will be limited to what the .NET runtime can do.

@fuzzyastrocat ahhh ok
In JS: == compares values without compare type
In JS: === compares values with compare type
In C#: Has ==
In C#: No ===

@TheForArkLD Oh, interesting. That's kinda bad, I see why you included it here!

@fuzzyastrocat :D
(But In Obratnaya, == is =, === is ==.)

@TheForArkLD (Makes sense, since = doesn't mean assignment here)

@fuzzyastrocat yes, but it has define for assignment

@TheForArkLD Right (that's what I meant by "= doesn't mean assignment here")

@fuzzyastrocat o

@TheForArkLD ...bratnaya :D

@fuzzyastrocat someone is saying same lmao

@fuzzyastrocat To explain better, C# is statically typed. therefor it doesn't need an exact equality operator as comparisons are already restricted to their own types except for a select few implicit conversions such as a char to an int, since an int can hold the same values as a char (0 - 255 | -127 - 127)

@CSharpIsGud Yeah, that makes sense...

@Miner36 bc assembly makes long code

@Miner36 and this is installing packages before run

@VulcanWM Thanks :D

np :) @TheForArkLD

@CarlosRosiles lmao it's binary

@CarlosRosiles hey i'm using a chromebook

@AJDevelopment wdym

@TheForArkLD is confused in I changed my username post

@AJDevelopment also i invited you to the team ADDCOOLNAMEHERE

@AJDevelopment yes and ok

@AJDevelopment ok, lets do thing by team!

@TheForArkLD Yeah, lets do it! two random imagined people jump and there's a freeze frame

@AJDevelopment E

@firefish wdym

@TheForArkLD The C pre-processor? gcc -E?

@firefish no

@TheForArkLD It basically replaces the #include statements with the raw source code of the header files included, when you #define something it replaces all instances of that reference to the value of the macro

@firefish ahhhh, so you want know how does #include work?

@TheForArkLD in obratnaya yeah, I want to look at the source, but I can't find it easily, and my C# decompiler is acting up

@TheForArkLD Forgot to look at GitHub my question is answered

slft += File.ReadAllText(path).Split(new char[]{'\n'}).Length - 1;
all = (File.ReadAllText(path) + "\n" + Regex.Replace(code.Replace("\r",""),@"#include " + oldpath + "\n","")).Split(new char[]{'\n'});
code = File.ReadAllText(path) + "\n" + Regex.Replace(code.Replace("\r",""),@"#include " + oldpath + "\n","");

it works the same way as in c

@firefish o

@TheForArkLD bratnaya?

@firefish wat

@TheForArkLD you said o, and i said bratnaya?

@firefish ahhhh ok
(btw my o means oh)

@TheForArkLD I know, it's just jokes are.... aaarrrggrhaghgharghgahghagrhghgrarghargharghagrhgarhgarhg,

@firefish yossss

@fuzzyastrocat yea, but transpiler is failed 😭
i'll add transpiler 😁

@TheForArkLD Oh, you had a transpiler to x86? (That would be a compiler actually)

@fuzzyastrocat no lol
i transpiled Obratnaya to C#, and compiled it only.

@TheForArkLD Wait, now I'm confused. What do you mean by "compiled it only"?

@fuzzyastrocat ok look at this
1. transpile Obratnaya to C#
2. compile it to x86

@TheForArkLD Ok, so you do both/either? (either because you said you stopped the transpiling version)

@fuzzyastrocat either.

@TheForArkLD Ok, so you already compile. I understand now, sorry for the confusion! :D

@fuzzyastrocat :D

@TheForArkLD C# doesn't compile to x86

@CSharpIsGud huh ur brain is bit old
use System.Reflection.Emit

@TheForArkLD https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.reflection.emit?view=netcore-3.1 Microsoft intermediate language (MSIL)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Intermediate_Language

C# is compiled to a bytecode first, then it is run(JIT) by its vm(.NET runtime)

@CSharpIsGud oh, thanks for fix my brain

@RaidTheWeb ik but you helped me

@TheForArkLD final response = true;

@RaidTheWeeb well, grilled cookie is looking too grilled

Wait, you're @RaidTheWeb?! I thought you were @RaidTheWeeb the whole time lol

@DynamicSquid see docs in github :D

@DynamicSquid We've got some rivals eh?

indeed you do

@HahaYes Eh, Rex is higher level and actually has an advantage over most modern languages. (sorry, but this seems more like a hybrid between Assembly, C, Forth, and even some BASIC, but doesn't have an advantage over most modern languages including JS and Python...)

@AmazingMech2418 yes we do! Which one do we submit... rex or adaptX? Confusion?

@AmazingMech2418 we could split our teams to get a better chance...

@HahaYes Rex and AdaptX are the same thing. We changed the name to Rex, but the AdaptX repl is just C++ Rex.

@AmazingMech2418 ah ok we've also got some easter eggs

@HahaYes Nice! LOL! I'll make sure to add them to the JS version!

@HahaYes By the way, the JS version has functions now! Now, for returning values from the functions... LOL!

@AmazingMech2418 yessir.

@HarperframeInc yes :D
you can see docs in github.