I have a friend at school (we will call him Miko for his privacy) and he believes that humans are more random than computers. I have created this website to prove him wrong! Press the buttons as randomly as humanly possible. Repeat that 10 or more times. Thank you if you did it! Go to statistics to view that my argument (computers are more random than humans) holds true!

Homework

I've been learning about the other 3 trigonometric functions: cosecant, secant, and cotangent. What is the point of these functions?

Help

Miko claims humans are more random because their "algorithm" for generating random number always changes. When the human is feeling silly, he might respond with 69 (nice) and if he is feeling mathematical, he might respond with 3.14159265358979323846264338 (pi) or 2.71828182845904523536028747135266967 (e). Please comment below with counter-arguments!

Closing

Thank you if you did the experiment and be sure to do the homework set up for you and the help as well!

Vote up if you liked this fun experiment!

Thanks a lot for messing up my data lol

Next time please fork and get your own endpoint at jsonstore.io. Thanks! Happy hacking! What did I just say? (to whoever messed up my data again)

However, the data shows that humans even if they can predict it (remember it is pseudo-random) gives even distribution however humans don't. @JordanDixon1

ARE COMPUTERS MORE RANDOM THAN HUMANS?I have a friend at school (we will call him Miko for his privacy) and he believes that

humansare more random than computers. I have created this website to prove him wrong! Press the buttons as randomly as humanly possible. Repeat that 10 or more times. Thank you if you did it! Go to statistics to view that my argument (computersare more random than humans) holds true!## Homework

I've been learning about the other 3 trigonometric functions: cosecant, secant, and cotangent. What is the point of these functions?

## Help

Miko claims humans are more random because their "algorithm" for generating random number always changes. When the human is feeling silly, he might respond with 69 (nice) and if he is feeling mathematical, he might respond with 3.14159265358979323846264338 (pi) or 2.71828182845904523536028747135266967 (e). Please comment below with counter-arguments!

ClosingThank you if you did the experiment and be sure to do the homework set up for you and the help as well!

Vote up if you liked this fun experiment!Thanks a lot for messing up my data lolNext time please fork and get your own endpoint at jsonstore.io. Thanks! Happy hacking!

What did I just say?(to whoever messed up my dataagain)However, the data shows that humans even if they can predict it (remember it is

pseudo-random) gives even distribution however humans don't. @JordanDixon1