The best and most common judge remarks from the jam.
CSharpIsGud (601)

Here is a list of what I think were the best judge remarks

Plurality: Honestly I have no idea what this is. It appears to be some kind of manifesto about OOP and how it can be improved, but the writing is so strange that I can't make sense of it. It seems they tried to implement this first in Python and then in C++ but didn't get very far.

Crow: Seems they wrote an interpreter for a simple language.

Common remarks:

Lisp: x2
Python-like: x3
C-like: x3
Simple (Design or implementation): x10
Doesn't work/Not much functionality: x7
Functional: x5
No comment: x8

It took me like an hour or two of constant reading to make this list.

I would put the langs that are useless or serve basically no purpose here too, but that would probably be insulting.
They know what they are.

ᴮʸ ᵗʰᵉ ʷᵃʸ, ᴵ'ᵐ ᵐᵃᵏᶦⁿᵍ ᵃ ˢᵐᵃˡˡ ˡᵃⁿᵍᵘᵃᵍᵉ ᵗʰᵃᵗ'ˢ ᵍᵒᶦⁿᵍ ᵗᵒ ᶜᵒᵐᵖᶦˡᵉ ᵗᵒ ᵇʳᵃᶦⁿᶠ. ᴹᵃʸᵇᵉ ᴵ'ˡˡ ᵐᵃᵏᵉ ᶦᵗ ᵐʸ ᶜʸᶜˡᵉ ˢᵖᵉᶜᶦᵃˡ ᵇᵉᶜᵃᵘˢᵉ ᴵ ᵗʰᶦⁿᵏ ᶦᵗ'ˢ ᵗʰᵉ ᵒⁿˡʸ ᵗʰᶦⁿᵍ ᴵ'ᵛᵉ ˢᵉᵉⁿ ᵗʰᵃᵗ'ˢ ᵖᵒˢˢᶦᵇˡʸ ʷᵒʳˢᵉ ᵗʰᵃⁿ ᴼˢ ᴰᵉᵛ.

You are viewing a single comment. View All
fuzzyastrocat (789)

I wish there were more remarks... for lots of langs there was just "No Comment" and for others it was really brief.

(that's cool, compiling to brainF is not a common idea so go for it!)