Before we get into the results I want to say that I hate judging, and I wish everyone could get something, though no one sponsered this, and I do not have that much money lol. If I had enough, I would give participation prizes, but idk(pencil case! :D).
The actual results
- 1st @Bookie0! With: 25 points (highest score!)
@Bookie0 made a tutorial, and sacrificed his brain cells, to participate! HE MADE A EPIKK TUTOIAL ON LOLCODE(pardon my horrible LOL talk)
- 2nd @fuzzyastrocat! With: 24 points
@fuzzyastrocat made a great tutorial on how to make a programming language in C. Great tutorial, I gave this one 2nd because honestly, it helped me, and it could really help other people. You can find it here
NOTE: Not saying that that CookeyLang Tutorial is bad, fuzzy's tutorial just helped people actually make a language, like cookey.
- 3rd @Coder100! With: 24 points
I wanted to also show the AWESOME people who participated in this Tutorial Jam!
- @RayhanADev! With: 22 points
@RayhanADev made a great tutorial on GraphQL it helped me out! You can view his great tutorial here
- @JBYT27 With: 20 points
Are you learning python? This tutorial will help(
although i suggest you learn something else ;)) his amazing python tutorial
uh if your too bored to read the stuff, uh, bookie0 won
I tried to give everyone one five on something(i think i succeded) and yeah.
This jam was a great time! I loved reading your tutorials, and I hope you post more(who knows...part 2?)
Ok so some of you guys think you should get a better score. This is nothing but my opion. You guys are entitled to your opion. So you can believe what you can believe.
And I am guessing, that bookie wants discord nitro
since he already begged me like 10000 times
Some of you may think @fuzzyastrocat should have won.
Yes their tutorial was really really really really good. But some parts were hard to understand(readablility). Not all but some. Sorry if it was my lack of understanding stuff, but I try to look from a beginner side of view. I know that tutorial was not for beginners but I meant for beginners of language-design. Sorry if I just made a bad choice.
sorry :(( I feel bad to everyone who didn't get a prize I was trying to look at a beginners point of view on lang-design, it was really good, and people could easily understand it, but idk, some parts were hard to read for me idk if thats just my ADHD Then I saw you say what to improve? Well, it is really good the way it is, just (you do not have to change this btw) some paragraphs were super long, and that was a little hard for me to read (because I often get lost when there is a bunch of sentences infront of me) and last thing:
Eh, I mean being a comprehensive guide with respect to langdev means being an incredibly detailed tome while being a taste means a regular tutorial, but maybe that was ellipie's rationale?
Am so dumb... smh I should've had more judges so we can all see whos best. It probably was just me. :((( overall sorry. :(